A photo of a sunset, with silhouettes of trees at the foreground
« All Posts by this Blogger
A photograph of a professor talking while a slide saying, "Explaining the Joke" is in the background.

One of the perks of being a Dartmouth student is that your Dartmouth.edu inbox becomes filled with various events from a variety of departments and student organizations that are free and open to campus! Once I declared my double-major in economics and philosophy, I started to receive emails from these departments offering a variety of free opportunities to engage with these disciplines further! One of these emails made me stop in my tracks:

Invite to a lecture called "Explaining the Joke" by Kieran Setiya.
The email I received inviting me to a Philosophy talk about ethical jokes.

This talk seemed timely given the fact that so many things people say in the world that could be perceived as offensive are brushed off as "just a joke." The burden then falls on the recipient of the "joke." If you react in a way that implies you found it funny, you risk opening yourself up to more "jokes." On the other hand, if you make it clear that you did not find that funny, the blame shifts to you, as you're implying their sense of humor is bad, or you're "too sensitive." While some jokes are clearly jokes that are light-hearted (even if their funniness is subjective), others toe the line between humor and offense. 

This was how I found myself sitting in Dartmouth Hall 105 on a Friday afternoon, listening to Professor Kierna Setiya from MIT explain jokes in a philosophical manner. He went over what he called the "idea of basic mirth" — that is, a joke plays on the mistake of some kind of structure or being, i.e. by making fun of ourselves or making fun of others. The core nature of jokes is that they violate some type of norm. Professor Setiya then claimed that in order for a joke to be funny, the joke must violate norms in a way that warrants ethical amusement. In short, in order for a joke to be funny, one must ethically be able to be amused. If that pleasure is not warranted or ethical, then the amusement then becomes vicious. I then realized the distinction between finding something funny, amusing, and laughter as a result of either of those two. Just because a joke isn't "funny" by these terms doesn't necessarily mean that people won't find them amusing, or that they won't laugh. By the time the talk ended, I found myself thinking back to my experience with seeing other people make offensive remarks under the guise of "jokes" and how there were always some who agreed (and probably found it amusing), while others claimed offense, in a new light. In a way, our humor is indicative of our values as well. 

Posts You Might Like